Skip to content

ci(secret-scan): rename caller job key secret-scan -> scan (D243) - #82

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/secret-scan-floor-key
Oct 1, 2026
Merged

ci(secret-scan): rename caller job key secret-scan -> scan (D243)#82
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/secret-scan-floor-key

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

@hyperpolymath hyperpolymath commented Oct 1, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What

Rename the secret-scanner caller job key secret-scan → scan in .github/workflows/secret-scanner.yml, so the check context becomes scan / gitleaks — the context the estate Secret-Scan-Floor ruleset (D243/D244) requires. One-line change; reusable pin, triggers and permissions unchanged. actionlint output is identical before and after.

Commit created via GraphQL createCommitOnBranch (GitHub-signed, signature valid: true).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_0136eszqrQ53Kj7aBH1D4rXK

Deferred red checks

@hyperpolymath @claude
ci(secret-scan): rename caller job key secret-scan -> scan (D243)
a805d90 
Secret-Scan-Floor (D243/D244) requires the context `scan / gitleaks` estate-wide. The caller job key here was `secret-scan`, which emits `secret-scan / gitleaks` and can never satisfy the floor. Rename only; the reusable pin and permissions are unchanged.

actionlint output identical before and after.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0136eszqrQ53Kj7aBH1D4rXK
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 1, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius.

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 1035c945-aaad-4520-8876-584527589b4b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6f7b393 and a805d90.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/secret-scanner.yml

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (17)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Licence consistency
  • GitHub Check: governance / Code quality + docs
  • GitHub Check: governance / Trusted-base reduction policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Workflow security linter
  • GitHub Check: governance / Check Workflow Staleness
  • GitHub Check: governance / Actions lockfile verify
  • GitHub Check: governance / Guix packaging policy (Nix retired)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Exemption ratchet
  • GitHub Check: governance / Debt ratchet
  • GitHub Check: governance / Language / package anti-pattern policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Live Actions policy (credentialed advisory)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Security policy checks
  • GitHub Check: governance / Allowlist Preflight
  • GitHub Check: scan / shell-secrets
  • GitHub Check: scan / gitleaks
  • GitHub Check: hypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis
  • GitHub Check: semgrep-cloud-platform/scan
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/secret-scanner.yml (1)

21-21: LGTM!

📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal automation. There are no changes to product functionality or the experience available to end-users.

Walkthrough

The secret scanner workflow job identifier changed from secret-scan to scan. Its reusable workflow and inherited secrets configuration are unchanged.

Changes

Secret scanner workflow

Layer / File(s) Summary
Rename the workflow job
.github/workflows/secret-scanner.yml		 The job identifier changed from secret-scan to scan. The reusable workflow and inherited secrets configuration remain unchanged.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Change: Bug fix

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to a805d

The required secret-scanner check is satisfied, so no actionable merge risk remains.

Architecture Summary

Architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to a805d

The changed surface does not map to a changed system, dependency edge, entrypoint, or external dependency.

Changed systems: None identified.

Architecture concerns
No architecture-level concerns identified.

Review details

Before / after behavior

  • observed — Modified behavior in .github/workflows/secret-scanner.yml: Renamed the workflow job from secret-scan to scan.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description check ✅ Passed The description clearly explains the job-key rename and its required check context. It is directly related to the changeset.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly identifies the CI change and the exact job-key rename. It is concise and specific.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
  • Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Autopilot is currently an internal CodeRabbit preview.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

A rabbit checked the scanner’s name,
One short change, the rest the same.
The workflow keeps its secret flow,
While scan is now the job to know.
The rabbit hops away in glee.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit 1ccdb81 into main Oct 1, 2026
22 of 24 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the ci/secret-scan-floor-key branch October 1, 2026 12:42
This was referenced Oct 1, 2026
Open
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@hyperpolymath